Evaluation of a novel bimodal fitting formula in Advanced Bionics cochlear implant recipients
Evaluation of a novel bimodal fitting formula in Advanced Bionics cochlear implant recipients
The study’s objectives were to (1) evaluate benefit from a novel bimodal fitting formula (Adaptive
Phonak Digital Bimodal Fitting Formula [APDB]), and (2) compare outcomes with APDB and a traditional
fitting formula (NAL-NL2).
Methods: This prospective study evaluated outcomes in ten adults with unilateral Advanced Bionics (AB)
cochlear implants (CI). Participants were tested bimodally with NAL-NL2 and APDB programed on Naída
Link UP HAs. Measures of speech perception, sound quality, and preference were obtained with two
bimodal configurations (CI + HANAL-NL2 and CI + HAAPDB). Participants used the CI + HAAPDB
configuration for an acclimation period, after which measures were repeated.
Results: Significant bimodal benefit was measured from both HA fitting formulae for speech perception in
noise compared to the CI-only condition. Improved individual outcomes with the APDB were observed,
but group differences were not statistically significant. Participants reported subjective benefit from APDB
on blind comparisons of preference and sound quality.
Conclusions: Significant benefit was found with both bimodal conditions compared to the CI-only condition;
however, bimodal speech perception results were not significantly different. Users reported benefit from the
APDB formula over NAL-NL2 formula. Due to individual improved speech perception and overall subjective
preference for APDB, clinicians should consider APDB with AB CI recipients.
Cochlear Implant, Hearing Aid, Bimodal, Fitting Formula
The study’s objectives were to (1) evaluate benefit from a novel bimodal fitting formula (Adaptive
Phonak Digital Bimodal Fitting Formula [APDB]), and (2) compare outcomes with APDB and a traditional
fitting formula (NAL-NL2).
Methods: This prospective study evaluated outcomes in ten adults with unilateral Advanced Bionics (AB)
cochlear implants (CI). Participants were tested bimodally with NAL-NL2 and APDB programed on Naída
Link UP HAs. Measures of speech perception, sound quality, and preference were obtained with two
bimodal configurations (CI + HANAL-NL2 and CI + HAAPDB). Participants used the CI + HAAPDB
configuration for an acclimation period, after which measures were repeated.
Results: Significant bimodal benefit was measured from both HA fitting formulae for speech perception in
noise compared to the CI-only condition. Improved individual outcomes with the APDB were observed,
but group differences were not statistically significant. Participants reported subjective benefit from APDB
on blind comparisons of preference and sound quality.
Conclusions: Significant benefit was found with both bimodal conditions compared to the CI-only condition;
however, bimodal speech perception results were not significantly different. Users reported benefit from the
APDB formula over NAL-NL2 formula. Due to individual improved speech perception and overall subjective
preference for APDB, clinicians should consider APDB with AB CI recipients.
Cochlear Implant, Hearing Aid, Bimodal, Fitting Formula