National Acoustic Laboratories Library

Test-retest reliability of dual-recorded brainstem versus cortical auditory-evoked potentials to speech (Record no. 2848)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field nam a22 7a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20180209145504.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180209b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency National Acoustics Laboratories
Description conventions National Acoustics Laboratories
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Test-retest reliability of dual-recorded brainstem versus cortical auditory-evoked potentials to speech
518 3# - DATE/TIME AND PLACE OF AN EVENT NOTE
Date/time and place of an event note Background: Auditory-evoked potentials have proven useful in the objective evaluation of sound<br/>encoding at different stages of the auditory pathway (brainstem and cortex). Yet, their utility for<br/>use in clinical assessment and empirical research relies critically on the precision and test–retest repeatability<br/>of the measure.<br/>Purpose: To determine how subcortical/cortical classes of auditory neural responses directly compare in<br/>terms of their internal consistency and test–retest reliability within and between listeners.<br/>Research Design: A descriptive cohort study describing the dispersion of electrophysiological measures.<br/>Study Sample: Eight young, normal-hearing female listeners.<br/>Data Collection and Analysis: Werecorded auditory brainstemresponses (ABRs), brainstem frequencyfollowing<br/>responses (FFRs), and cortical (P1-N1-P2) auditory-evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds<br/>in the same set of listeners. We reassessed responses within each of four different test sessions over a<br/>period of 1 mo, allowing us to detect possible changes in latency/amplitude characteristics with finer detail<br/>than in previous studies.<br/>Results: Our findings show that brainstem and cortical amplitude/latency measures are remarkably stable;<br/>with the exception of slight prolongation of the P1 wave, we found no significant variation in any<br/>response measure. Intraclass correlation analysis revealed that the speech-evoked FFR amplitude<br/>and latency measures achieved superior repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient .0.85) among<br/>the more widely used obligatory brainstem (ABR) and cortical (P1-N1-P2) auditory-evoked potentials.<br/>Contrasting these intersubject effects, intrasubject variability (i.e., within-subject coefficient of variation)<br/>revealed that while latencies were more stable than amplitudes, brainstem and cortical responses did not<br/>differ in their variability at the single subject level.<br/>Conclusions: We conclude that (1) the variability of auditory neural responses increases with ascending<br/>level along the auditory neuroaxis (cortex.brainstem) between subjects but remains highly stable within<br/>subjects and (2) speech-FFRs might provide a more stable measure of auditory function than other conventional<br/>responses (e.g., click-ABR), given their lower inter- and intrasubject variability
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element auditory brainstem response
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element event-related brain potentials,
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element frequency-following response,
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element intraclass correlation coefficient,
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element test–retest reliability
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gavin M Bidelman
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Relationship information 29:164-174 (2018)
Title Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://dspace.nal.gov.au/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/790/Test%E2%80%93Retest%20Reliability%20of%20Dual-Recorded%20Brainstem.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y">https://dspace.nal.gov.au/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/790/Test%E2%80%93Retest%20Reliability%20of%20Dual-Recorded%20Brainstem.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y</a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Universal Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal article

No items available.

Powered by Koha