National Acoustic Laboratories Library
Image from Google Jackets

Representation of speech in human auditory cortex: Is it special?

By: Material type: ArticleArticleSubject(s): Online resources: In: Hearing Research 305 (2013) 57e73Abstract: Successful categorization of phonemes in speech requires that the brain analyze the acoustic signal along both spectral and temporal dimensions. Neural encoding of the stimulus amplitude envelope is critical for parsing the speech stream into syllabic units. Encoding of voice onset time (VOT) and place of articulation (POA), cues necessary for determining phonemic identity, occurs within shorter time frames. An unresolved question is whether the neural representation of speech is based on processing mechanisms that are unique to humans and shaped by learning and experience, or is based on rules governing general auditory processing that are also present in non-human animals. This question was examined by comparing the neural activity elicited by speech and other complex vocalizations in primary auditory cortex of macaques, who are limited vocal learners, with that in Heschl’s gyrus, the putative location of primary auditory cortex in humans. Entrainment to the amplitude envelope is neither specific to humans nor to human speech. VOT is represented by responses time-locked to consonant release and voicing onset in both humans and monkeys. Temporal representation of VOT is observed both for isolated syllables and for syllables embedded in the more naturalistic context of running speech. The fundamental frequency of male speakers is represented by more rapid neural activity phase-locked to the glottal pulsation rate in both humans and monkeys. In both species, the differential representation of stop consonants varying in their POA can be predicted by the relationship between the frequency selectivity of neurons and the onset spectra of the speech sounds. These findings indicate that the neurophysiology of primary auditory cortex is similar in monkeys and humans despite their vastly different experience with human speech, and that Heschl’s gyrus is engaged in general auditory, and not language-specific, processing.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Successful categorization of phonemes in speech requires that the brain analyze the acoustic signal along
both spectral and temporal dimensions. Neural encoding of the stimulus amplitude envelope is critical
for parsing the speech stream into syllabic units. Encoding of voice onset time (VOT) and place of
articulation (POA), cues necessary for determining phonemic identity, occurs within shorter time frames.
An unresolved question is whether the neural representation of speech is based on processing mechanisms
that are unique to humans and shaped by learning and experience, or is based on rules governing
general auditory processing that are also present in non-human animals. This question was examined by
comparing the neural activity elicited by speech and other complex vocalizations in primary auditory
cortex of macaques, who are limited vocal learners, with that in Heschl’s gyrus, the putative location of
primary auditory cortex in humans. Entrainment to the amplitude envelope is neither specific to humans
nor to human speech. VOT is represented by responses time-locked to consonant release and voicing
onset in both humans and monkeys. Temporal representation of VOT is observed both for isolated syllables
and for syllables embedded in the more naturalistic context of running speech. The fundamental
frequency of male speakers is represented by more rapid neural activity phase-locked to the glottal
pulsation rate in both humans and monkeys. In both species, the differential representation of stop
consonants varying in their POA can be predicted by the relationship between the frequency selectivity
of neurons and the onset spectra of the speech sounds. These findings indicate that the neurophysiology
of primary auditory cortex is similar in monkeys and humans despite their vastly different experience
with human speech, and that Heschl’s gyrus is engaged in general auditory, and not language-specific,
processing.

Powered by Koha