National Acoustic Laboratories Library
Image from Google Jackets

Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSubject(s): Online resources: In: J. Acoust. Soc. Am Vol. 133, No. 2, February 2013Abstract: Acoustic simulations were used to study the contributions of spatial hearing that may arise from combining a cochlear implant with either a second implant or contralateral residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in twenty-talker babble. Spatial separation of speech and noise was simulated using a spherical head model. While low-frequency acoustic information contralateral to the implant simulation produced substantially better SRTs there was no effect of spatial cues on SRT, even when interaural differences were artificially enhanced. Simulated bilateral implants showed a significant head shadow effect, but no binaural unmasking based on interaural time differences, and weak, inconsistent overall spatial release from masking. There was also a small but significant non-spatial summation effect. It appears that typical cochlear implant speech processing strategies may substantially reduce the utility of spatial cues, even in the absence of degraded neural processing arising from auditory deprivation.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Acoustic simulations were used to study the contributions of spatial hearing that may arise from
combining a cochlear implant with either a second implant or contralateral residual low-frequency
acoustic hearing. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in twenty-talker babble.
Spatial separation of speech and noise was simulated using a spherical head model. While
low-frequency acoustic information contralateral to the implant simulation produced substantially
better SRTs there was no effect of spatial cues on SRT, even when interaural differences were
artificially enhanced. Simulated bilateral implants showed a significant head shadow effect, but no
binaural unmasking based on interaural time differences, and weak, inconsistent overall spatial
release from masking. There was also a small but significant non-spatial summation effect. It appears
that typical cochlear implant speech processing strategies may substantially reduce the utility of
spatial cues, even in the absence of degraded neural processing arising from auditory deprivation.

Powered by Koha