Electrophysiological and behavioural processing of complex acoustic cues
Material type:
TextOnline resources:
In:
Clinical Neurophysiology xxx (2015) xxx–xxxSubject: Objectives: To examine behavioural and neural processing of pitch cues in adults with normal hearing
(NH) and adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).
Methods: All participants completed a test of behavioural sensitivity to pitch cues using the TFS1 test
(Moore and Sek, 2009a). Cortical potentials (N1, P2 and acoustic change complex) were recorded in
response to frequency shifted (deltaF) tone complexes in an ‘ABA’ pattern.
Results: The SNHL group performed more poorly than the NH group for the TFS1 test. P2 was more reflective
of pitch differences between the complexes than N1. The presence of acoustic change complex in
response to the TFS transitions in the ABA stimulus varied with deltaF. Acoustic change complex amplitudes
were reduced for the group with SNHL compared to controls.
Conclusion: Behavioural performance and cortical responses reflect pitch processing depending on the
salience of pitch cues.
Significance: These data support the use of cortical potentials and behavioural sensitivity tests to measure
processing of complex acoustic cues in people with hearing loss. This approach has potential for evaluation
of benefit from auditory training and hearing instrument digital signal processing strategies.
Objectives: To examine behavioural and neural processing of pitch cues in adults with normal hearing
(NH) and adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).
Methods: All participants completed a test of behavioural sensitivity to pitch cues using the TFS1 test
(Moore and Sek, 2009a). Cortical potentials (N1, P2 and acoustic change complex) were recorded in
response to frequency shifted (deltaF) tone complexes in an ‘ABA’ pattern.
Results: The SNHL group performed more poorly than the NH group for the TFS1 test. P2 was more reflective
of pitch differences between the complexes than N1. The presence of acoustic change complex in
response to the TFS transitions in the ABA stimulus varied with deltaF. Acoustic change complex amplitudes
were reduced for the group with SNHL compared to controls.
Conclusion: Behavioural performance and cortical responses reflect pitch processing depending on the
salience of pitch cues.
Significance: These data support the use of cortical potentials and behavioural sensitivity tests to measure
processing of complex acoustic cues in people with hearing loss. This approach has potential for evaluation
of benefit from auditory training and hearing instrument digital signal processing strategies.