National Acoustic Laboratories Library
Image from Google Jackets

Auditory–cognitive training improves language performance in prelingually deafened cochlear implant recipients

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSubject(s): Online resources: In: Early Human Development 90 (2014) 673–678Abstract: Background: Auditory neural myelination (ANM) as evaluated by auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR) during the neonatal period has been used as a surrogate outcome for long-term neurodevelopment. The validity of ANM as a surrogate outcome for long-term neurodevelopment has not been well studied. Aim: Evaluate the association of ABR I–V interpeak latency (IPL), an index of ANM, at 35 week postmenstrual age (PMA) with language outcome at 3 years of age. Design: Prospective study. Subjects: 24–33 week gestational age (GA) infants were eligible if they did not meet exclusion criteria: craniofacial malformation, chromosomal disorders, deafness, auditory dys-synchrony, TORCH infection, or non-English speaking parents. Infants with malignancy, head injury, encephalopathy, meningitis, blindness, or who died or relocated were also excluded. Outcome measures: ABRs were performed at 35 week PMA using 80 dB nHL and I–V IPL (ms) measured. Auditory Comprehension (AC) and Expressive Communication (EC) were evaluated by a speech-language pathologist at 3 years of age using Preschool Language Scale. Results: Eighty infants were studied. The mean GA and birth weight of infants were 29.2 weeks and 1336 g, respectively. There was association of worse ear I–V IPL and better ear I–V IPL with AC (Coefficient−5.4, 95% CI: −9.8 to −0.9 and Coefficient−5.5, 95% CI: −10 to−0.9, respectively) and EC (Coefficient−5.6, 95% CI: −9.5 to−1.8 and Coefficient−6.7, 95% CI: −10.6 to−2.7, respectively) after controlling for conf
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Background: Auditory neural myelination (ANM) as evaluated by auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR)
during the neonatal period has been used as a surrogate outcome for long-term neurodevelopment. The validity
of ANM as a surrogate outcome for long-term neurodevelopment has not been well studied.
Aim: Evaluate the association of ABR I–V interpeak latency (IPL), an index of ANM, at 35 week postmenstrual age
(PMA) with language outcome at 3 years of age.
Design: Prospective study.
Subjects: 24–33 week gestational age (GA) infants were eligible if they did not meet exclusion criteria: craniofacial
malformation, chromosomal disorders, deafness, auditory dys-synchrony, TORCH infection, or non-English
speaking parents. Infants with malignancy, head injury, encephalopathy, meningitis, blindness, or who died or
relocated were also excluded.
Outcome measures: ABRs were performed at 35 week PMA using 80 dB nHL and I–V IPL (ms) measured. Auditory
Comprehension (AC) and Expressive Communication (EC) were evaluated by a speech-language pathologist at
3 years of age using Preschool Language Scale.
Results: Eighty infants were studied. The mean GA and birth weight of infants were 29.2 weeks and 1336 g,
respectively. There was association of worse ear I–V IPL and better ear I–V IPL with AC (Coefficient−5.4,
95% CI: −9.8 to −0.9 and Coefficient−5.5, 95% CI: −10 to−0.9, respectively) and EC (Coefficient−5.6, 95%
CI: −9.5 to−1.8 and Coefficient−6.7, 95% CI: −10.6 to−2.7, respectively) after controlling for conf

Powered by Koha